Caminante, no hay camino
is made by walking ...
Caminante, no hay camino,
but wakes in the sea.
(Machado)
While the first companies justified slave domination and hierarchy to the existence of celestial beings creators of all that exists on Earth, that dictated the social order, from one point slavery and hierarchy began to justify also the nature. Aristotle said that the superiority of man over woman, @ l @ s Niñ so on foreigners were natural things, and during twenty centuries of human thought has kept the social inferiority of women by the lower nature of female , etc. etc.
This is not surprising that when the theories of evolution of species entered the scientific world in the nineteenth century, then its implementation were influenced by the social order, to try to justify the domination and social hierarchy. Two schools of thought on evolution faced then, representing representing Darwin and Kropotkin. In Chapter 1 of The Assault on Hades tried to explain the validity of the theory of Kropotkin in line with current theory symbiogenesis (Lynn Margulis) and self autopoiesis (Maturana and Varela).
The symbiogenesis explains the genesis of an organic form by the symbiosis of two simple organic forms. The eukaryotic cell originated from the symbiosis of a cell without a nucleus with a bacterium. The eukaryotic cell resulting from the symbiosis integrated and set the cooperative interaction between the two independent organic forms (the cell without a nucleus and bacteria). When he found a fossil bacteria with the same DNA structure as it was considered proven symbiogenesis, evolutionary theory developed by Margulis. And yet I think the clearest evidence of simbiogenético mechanism of evolution, it is the organizational model of the complex sets of systems that, for example, without going any further, make up our own body: a synergy l
The amazing performance of hypercomplex sets of systems, organs, cells, molecules, etc., with millions of concurrent relationships in all directions and senses, at all levels of organization (molecular, cellular, etc.), in a unison and harmony, is explained by the genetic mechanism of integration symbiosis of simplicity in the complex, whereby it is the simple development of who makes the union to form a more complex form. Synergy is made from simple and the pulse shape simpler life, self-regulation and dynamics which does not vanish but becomes part of the complex. So every part that integrates a complex organism 'knows' what to do and does it without being told, no line of command or hierarchy. Life and its diversity is a philosophical genesis of 3 billion years, so it works well and is unmatched by any artificial design. Mutual Aid Kropotkin envisaged in the Russian steppes, has been confirmed in the microscopic life, explaining the evolution as a process of establishment of cooperative interaction.
The symbiogenesis explains l to autopoiesis, the capacity to be life itself, explaining that evolution has not been nor is there any default, they are phenomena which succeed each other, and result in diversity forms and ecosystems, (necessarily interrelated), a variety and diversity of forms as a whole panorama shows us the way and mechanism of their formation.
Sometimes I have heard the argument that the similarity of forms, such as the spiral or helical structures, is evidence that they respond to a predetermined pattern. Here again reverses the cause-effect relationship: the spiral helical structure or what they show is the pulsating movement of life, the trace of the pulse of all life corpuscle fixing such forms. Like the motion of all particles of matter waves often produce. Machado explained it very well with his verses: no way, is made by walking / walking, there is no way but wakes in the sea. spirals and the helical structures are the trails left by life on the journey of its evolution.
autopoiesis, as explained by Humberto Maturana refers to this quality of life to make itself, without designer or creator, which is derived another important quality also: its ability to self-regulation.
Kropotkin also in force in this respect: without actually coined a new concept, also spoke of autopoiesis and the indeterminacy of phenomena:
What is called 'natural law' is not just a certain relationship between phenomena that we see indistinctly ... ie if a particular phenomenon occurs under certain conditions, it would follow other specific phenomenon. There is no law apart from the phenomena is the one that governs every phenomenon what follows, not the law. There is nothing in what we call preconceived harmony of nature. Chance of collisions and encounters has been enough to prove it. This phenomenon will last centuries because the adjustment, the balance represents, has taken centuries to settle.
And also:
After fixing his attention on the sun and the large planets, astronomers are now beginning to study infinitely small bodies that populate the universe. And discover that the interplanetary and interstellar space are populated and crossed in all imaginable directions by small clusters of matter, invisible, infinitely small when considering the corpuscles by separately, but omnipotent by number. These are infinitely small bodies ... today's astronomers analyzing seeking explanation ... the movements that animate its parts, and overall harmony. Another step, and soon the same universal gravitation is not merely the result of all disorderly and incoherent movements of these bodies infinitely small: from oscillations of atoms that act in all possible directions. Thus, the center, origin of the force, once transferred from the earth to the sun, once again, now scattered and spread. It is everywhere and nowhere. As the astronomer, we see that solar systems are the work of infinitely small bodies, that was supposed to govern the system is itself only the result of the collision of these infinitely small clusters of matter, that the harmony of star systems only is a consequence and result of all these countless movements that unite, complete and balance each other. With this new design change the general view of the universe. The idea that a force ruled the world, a pre-established law of harmony preconceived disappears and gives way to the harmony that Fourier envisioned: that the movement is incoherent and messy subject of countless groups, each following its own course and keeping all in equilibrium.
seemed impossible a regression of scientific thought creationism, but that is what is happening and now the conflict between Darwin and Kropotkin has been displaced by the conflict between Darwinism and creationism.
From my point of view and from my limited knowledge, neither Darwinism nor creationism explain the evolution of life, how it is and how it works, and this is why they serve to justify slavery, dominance and social hierarchy. Darwinism serves to justify a hierarchy and domination that would be at the discretion of the skills or the ability to a @ s for l @ s imposed on others. Creationists attempt to justify the domination mabsoluta, in which each would have its mission defined by the operator (call the Supreme Being, God, conscious universe, etc.etc.: Cosmic order as a default set and is also a predetermined function and the mission that each which must meet and which is transmitted by the command line, at the apex would be the operator and the next lower grade messengers and interpreters, and then a whole range of officials to monitor that each fulfills its mission by good or bad. Creationism is the justification of a slave society such as ancient Hindu (Code of Manu, etc.), Which in addition or instead, to ban this or that, be entrusted with a mission to accomplish. While bans codes specific things leaves room for the rest, the entire mission life slaves, though in return offer you 'peace of the dead' the tranquility of the protection of Power: 'the sun of peace' that is behind all your actions and your companion, as the advertisement. The mission is worse for l @ s @ s slave to the string of specific orders, because it enslaves more, but it is better for the power because it is more efficient in terms of extortion and looting of life.
the definition from above that every human life must be done, you have to block the internal dynamics of that life (hence the taboo of sex is historically associated with slavery, and so now rages with new strategies for human libidinal system freeze for increased repression of feelings disguised under the euphemism of emotional control).
Creationism course, does not stand symbiogenesis or organization resulting synergy as the evolutionary process that builds synergy with the pulsating movement, and internal self-regulating itself of every living being. On the contrary, has a special interest in living things show no dynamics and hierarchy as natural, because behind creationism in all its forms, today as yesterday, is the justification of domination.
The Mimosa, March 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment